SOME CONCEPTS IN ENERGETICS
Introduction.
Energetics (or thermodynamics) is the branch of physical
chemistry that describes, on the macroscopic level, matter, its properties and
the physical and chemical changes it undergoes. It has great power because the
entire building of relationships that have been developed rests on only two
principles that have never been invalidated by experimental evidence. Therefore,
its conclusions are valid as long as they are properly derived. At the same
time, energetics have important limitations. It is based on a simplified model,
or representation, of physical reality which totally ignores the microscopic
structure of matter. Hence, the theory cannot yield direct information about the
microscopic realm. Only when additional assumptions about molecules are
introduced can it contribute to our understanding of processes at the molecular
level. Still, precisely because their reliability is not weakened by their
dependence on these assumptions, the results obtained are considered as the most
dependable in the whole realm of physics. Another limitation of classical
thermodynamics is that its theory has nothing to say about the rates at which
processes take place; it only predicts the direction of the change. We can
theoretically establish that glucose spontaneously reacts with oxygen to form
carbon dioxide and water. (In fact, we can induce this reaction to proceed
explosively.) Yet, we may keep glucose in the presence of oxygen for years
without observing any changes. Time
is not a factor considered in thermodynamics.
Living systems continuously transform energy through both
physical and chemical processes. Being alive implies the necessity too acquire
energy from the surroundings in some form and to process it in numerous
different ways so that this energy appears in different forms. The chemical
energy contained in potential form in the carbon compounds that serve as
nutrients to a cell, or the radiant energy trapped by chlorophyll, eventually
appear partly as the work done by the cell in synthesizing many new molecules,
in transporting substance across the membrane, in movement, etc., and partly as
heat. The theory of thermodynamics constitutes the fundamental unifying
conceptual framework of all of these processes when considered as energy
transformations. Each of these processes is, then, a special case of a general
principle. Consequently, an understanding of this theory provides us with the
perspective that guides our thinking along reliable paths from the general to
the particular, and the tools to proceed down those paths with scientific
precision. An example may clarify this. In order to determine whether a certain
chemical reaction will proceed in a given direction or not, we need to apply the
same concepts and the same equations, both derived from thermodynamics, as when
considering whether a specific active transport across the plasma membrane of a
cell is feasible, or whether certain ionic species will spontaneously cross the
membrane, etc.
Thermodynamic theory depicts the world in a highly
simplified fashion. Each object is considered to be characterized by a small
number of measurable properties (temperature, pressure, energy, etc.) whose
values are uniform throughout the object. Any portion of the universe that one
wishes to consider with exclusion of the rest is called the system. The
excluded portion constitutes the surroundings of the system, and the real
or imaginary surface that separates them is the system’s boundary. A
particular cell, a mitochondrion, or a protein solution could be systems. These
would be real systems, but a system could also be a mental construct, a purely
imaginary one whose properties are arbitrarily defined. These ideal systems are
extremely useful in deriving the theoretical edifice of thermodynamics as well
as in analyzing some practical problems.
Systems interact with their surroundings through their boundaries, and may be classified according to the boundary’s properties. In an open system, heat, work and matter can cross the boundary. In a closed one, matter cannot cross. In an adiabatic one, matter and heat cannot cross In an isolated one, nothing can cross. Strictly speaking, adiabatic and isolated systems are ideal, since no real boundary can perfectly prevent the flow of heat.
Characterization of the state of a system.
In mechanics, a system is completely specified at a given
instant if the position and velocity of each mass-point are given. Six variables
are needed for each mass-point, three to specify the position and three for the
velocity. When a rigid macroscopic body is considered and only its overall state
of motion is of interest, the position and velocity of its center of mass are
sufficient to specify the state of the system. This simplified view ignores the
state of thermal motion of the material particles that constitute the body and,
consequently, cannot deal with heat exchanges. Still, it is useful in dealing
with certain problems. A full description of the dynamical state of the body
would require the specification of six variables for each material particle in the
body. This is clearly not practical.
In thermodynamics, a simpler concept of the sate of a system is introduced based on bulk properties: volume, pressure, temperature, composition, state of aggregation, etc., which are called variables of state or properties. A characteristic of a system is a variable of state or property only if its value does not depend on the past history of the system, but only on the conditions at the time of measurement. A property is either intensive or extensive depending on whether its value remains the same or is reduced when a part of the system is removed. Table I contains a list of some properties. A system is said to be in a specified state when all its variables or properties have specified values. A hot cup of coffee with a floating ice cube in it is not in a specified state because neither the temperature nor the concentration of coffee can be properly specified since they have different values in different parts of the system and they are changing. A defined state is a state of thermodynamic equilibrium if the values of its properties are independent of time and if there is no flow of matter or energy. A cell that is receiving nutrients and oxygen, metabolizing them, and releasing waste and heat, all at constant rates such that its temperature, volume, pressure and the concentrations of all its components remain constant in time, is not at equilibrium, but in a steady state, because matter and heat are flowing through its boundary. It is evident that the knowledge of the thermo dynamical state alone is not sufficient for the determination of its microscopic dynamical state. Given a certain thermo dynamical state of a homogeneous fluid, defined by any two of the variables of state, we observe that there is an infinite number of states of molecular motion that correspond to it. With increasing time, the system exists successively in all these dynamical states. Then we may say that a thermo dynamical state is the ensemble of all the dynamical states through which, as a result of molecular motion, the system is rapidly passing while the values of the sate variables remain constant.
A mathematical expression that relates some properties of a
system is called an equation of state. These are not derivable from
thermodynamic principles, but may be obtained empirically or derived from a
molecular theory. PV = nRT is an equation of state, and so is V = a + bT + cT2
+ dT3. On the other hand, a function of state is a
mathematical expression (an equation of state) that relates the value of a
property to the values of as many other properties as necessary to specify
the state of the system. P = P (n, V, T) indicates the existence of a
function of state for an ideal gas even though its precise form is not stated.
Its precise form, PV = nRT,
was obtained through experimentation. V = a + bT + cT2 + dT3 ,
on the other hand, is not a function of state because it does not include enough
properties to specify the state of the system. Gibbs established in 1878 the
phase rule, which states that, if a system consists of a single phase and a
single component, its state is fully defined (specified) when the values of one
extensive and of two intensive properties are known. For each additional
component in the system, the value of another intensive property needs to be
known; and for each additional phase, the value of one more extensive property
must be known. When these requirements are fulfilled, the values of all other
properties are determined.
TABLE I
Intensive and Extensive Properties
Extensive |
|
Intensive |
|
|
|
|
|
Mass |
|
Density |
|
|
|
Concentration of solutes |
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
Specific volume |
|
|
|
Molar volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temperature |
|
|
|
Pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
Molar Energy |
|
Entropy |
|
Molar Entropy |
|
Enthalpy |
|
Molar Enthalpy |
|
Free Energy |
|
Chemical Potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dielectric Constant |
|
|
|
Viscosity |
|
|
|
Refractive Index
|
Process.
A process is an event in which the value of at least
one property of the system changes in time. Therefore, the state of the system
changes, and the new state is characterized by the new values of the properties.
The occurrence of a process implies that the initial state of the system was not
a state of equilibrium or that an external influence is causing something (heat,
work or matter) to cross the system’s boundary. A system at equilibrium will
not spontaneously undergo a process, but when an external influence causes a
process to occur, the effect of that influence has been to transform the state
of the system into a nonequilibrium state and the process will then happen
spontaneously.
Consider the following two situations. The first one
consists of a gaseous mass in a cylinder covered with a frictionless piston with
added weight that compresses the gas. If we define our system as the gas, it
will be at equilibrium as long as its pressure, temperature and composition
remain constant (the volume will be, of course, determined by the other
properties). If now some of the weight on top of the piston is removed, the
pressure of the gas will momentarily be higher than the external pressure and
the gas will expand doing work on the surroundings by lifting the piston with
the remaining weight. Work crosses the boundary. We could have applied a heat
source to increase the temperature with the consequent expansion. Then, both
heat and work would cross the boundary. The second example consists of a Zn
electrode immersed in a solution of ZnCl2 and a copper electrode
immersed in a solution of CuSO4 , with both solutions electrically
communicated by a salt bridge forming an electrochemical cell. A potentiometric
device is connected to the electrodes to impose a variable electrical potential
difference to the cell. When the applied potential difference exactly opposes
the one generated by the call, the system is at equilibrium, i.e., no electrical
current will flow and no chemical reaction will take place. If the potential
difference applied to the cell is reduced, electrical current will flow throughout
he external circuit, i.e., electrical work will be done on the surroundings, a
chemical reaction will happen in the cell so the composition of the system
changes, and heat will be produced in the cell and flow to the surroundings. In
both examples, an intervention on the surroundings has disturbed the initial
state of equilibrium of the system.
A reversible process is one that, starting from
equilibrium, proceeds through a succession of equilibrium states, each differing
from the preceding one by only an infinitesimal change in at least on variable
of state. This seems to contradict the definition of equilibrium and, in fact,
reversible processes do not occur in nature; only irreversible processes happen
spontaneously. Yet, it is possible to conceive such a process. Imagine that, in
the above examples, the weight on the piston or the potential difference applied
by the potentiometer are reduced by one infinitesimal. The system will not be
essentially away from equilibrium, but it will undergo an infinitesimal change
in state. The gas, for example, will suffer an increase in volume and a decrease
in pressure both of an infinitesimal magnitude. If this is repeated an infinite
number of times, a finite change in volume and pressure, and consequently in the
state of the system, will take place.
Although reversible processes can only be approximated in practice, the concept is of extraordinary importance because some properties that involve heat may be defined and calculated only for this type of process. Since, by definition, the values of functions of state depend only on the state of the system, the change that these values undergo during a process depend only on what the initial and final states are, not on the route followed in going from one state to the other. In the example of the expansion of a compressed gas, let a portion of the external weight be removed suddenly thereby reducing the external pressure. The gas will rapidly expand from V1 to V2 and its pressure and temperature will drop from P1 and T1 to P2 and T2. Now, let heat flow from the hotter surroundings until the temperature equilibrates at T1 and the pressure and volume readjust to P 3 and V 3. This process consisted in the change in the state of the gas from V1 P1 T1 to V 3 P 3 T1 . A different way to conducting the same change in state would be to reversibly allow the same expansion by removing the weight in infinitely small amounts at a time. Then, the process will happen isothermically because heat will continuously flow into the gas at an infinitely slow rate and the temperature will remain equal to that of the surroundings. Therefore, when the volume reaches V 3 the pressure will be P 3 since the temperature is T1 and the equation of state does not allow any other value of P. So, we have achieved exactly the same change in state along a different path and, since the initial and final states are identical, the changes in the values of all properties are equal for both paths. This means that a calculation of any such change made for the reversible process will yield a result that is valid for any other process that starts at the same initial state and ends at the same final state.
The laws of thermodynamics
The entire edifice of thermodynamics is based on two principles (or laws) that cannot be proven or logically deduced. They are empirically derived and, because many attempts to prove them wrong have always failed, they are placed in a privileged category of scientific laws. Since only these two principles support its conclusions and no other assumptions regarding the structure of matter or of any other kind are invoked in deriving its results, these results are given greater validity than those of any other branch of physics.
1st Law - Conservation of Energy
Early in the study of physics one becomes acquainted with
the concepts of energy and work and with the notion that a system that has a
certain amount of potential energy, if properly controlled, can lose that energy
while doing work and releasing heat. The demonstration by Joule of the
quantitative equivalence between heat and work lead to the conclusion that the
loss of internal energy by the system is equal to the sum of the work performed
and the heat evolved.
)E = Q -
W
(1)
Consider the following reaction
Pyruvate (1M) + H2 (1 atm)
6
Lactate (1M)
It is convenient to define the quantity Q - W, in which Q
is heat absorbed and W is work done by the system, in order to evaluate the change in
energy of the system. If the reaction takes place reversibly in a suitable
electrochemical cell, it can perform as much as 47,865 joules of electrical work
while releasing 42, 677 joules as heat per mole of pyruvate transformed (W =
47,865 j /mol; Q = - 42,677 j /mol). Then, Q - W = - 90,542 j /mol, which is the
amount of energy lost by the system when 1 mole of pyruvate and one mole of
hydrogen are transformed into 1 mol of lactate. The same reaction could take
place in a closed vessel while not doing any work. Then, if the entire process
is conducted so that the final temperature and pressure are the same as in the
reversible process, Q = - 90,542 j /mol. Notice that in both processes the
system has undergone exactly the same change in state and lost the same amount
of energy, but W and Q are different for the two processes. Many other examples
in which the same is observed justify the conclusion that the energy change that
accompanies a change of state of a system only depends on the initial and final
states of the system and not on the way in which the change happened. Therefore,
E is a property of the system whereas Q and W are not.
The above relationship may be stated in differential form
for any process in which a system exchanges heat and work with its surroundings
dE = *Q
- *W
(1')
where “d” indicates an exact differential and “*”
an inexact differential. Properties are represented by functions of state, so,
their differentials are exact (for a discussion of exact and inexact
differentials, see Appendix I ). Consequently, for a finite change from
state 1 to state 2
(2)
When the only kind of work that the system can perform is
limited to expansion work by the way
its relationship to the surroundings is structured, (see Table II for various
forms of thermodynamic work) the change in E at constant volume is
dE = *QV
- PdV
where the subscript in Q means that the change happens at
constant volume. Then, if the process happens at constant volume, the change in
Q becomes equal to the change in E, which is a property, so its differential
becomes exact.
dE = dQV
)E =
)QV
(3)
The change in E for only expansion work and at constant
pressure (but variable volume) is
dE = *QP
- PdV
so
dQP = dE + PdV
(4)
which is an exact differential because it is a function of
properties of the state of the system and may be used to define a new property, enthalpy:
H = E + PV. Then, in general,
dH = *Q
- *W + PdV + VdP
(5)
For expansion work only,
dH = *Q + VdP
and, at constant pressure,
dH = dQP
(6)
which shows that a measurement of the heat exchanged by a
system during a process conducted at constant pressure and while doing only
expansion work is a measurement of the change in enthalpy of the system for that
process. Measurement of changes in enthalpy are the basis for the applications
of the first law in chemistry and biochemistry. Through these thermochemical studies it is possible to determine the relative energies of compounds and the
energies of chemical bonds.
TABLE II
Various Forms of Thermodynamic Work
|
Type |
|
Intensive Variable |
|
Extensive Differential |
|
Expression for Work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
Force, F |
|
Change in Distance, ds |
|
W = I Fds |
|
Expansion |
|
Pressure, P |
|
Volume Change, dV |
|
W = I PdV |
|
Electrical |
|
Voltage Difference, )M |
|
Change in Charge, dq |
|
W = I ) M dq |
|
Chemical |
|
Chemical Potential of Component A, :A |
|
Change in number of moles of A, d nA |
|
W = I :A d nA |
|
Surface |
|
Surface Tension, ( |
|
Change in Surface Area, dA |
|
W = I ( dA |
An important goal in
thermodynamics is to find a reliable criterion for spontaneity. Will a process
being considered happen spontaneously or not? The minimization of E is an
appropriate criterion for changes in the mechanical state of macroscopic systems
in which heat is not a factor, e.g., movement of masses in a gravitational
field. But many other spontaneous processes have )E
$ 0. When two
masses of the same metal at different temperatures are placed in contact with
each other while insulated from their surroundings, heat will transfer
spontaneously from the hotter mass to the cooler one. Still, for this process )E
= 0, since heat has not been exchanged with the surroundings and the expansion
of one mass (work) is canceled by
the contraction of the other. When ice is placed in surroundings at 1oC,
the ice will spontaneously melt while absorbing heat from the environment at
constant temperature. Since there is also a decrease in volume (ice is less
dense than water at that temperature),
)E = Q - W > 0.
These examples demonstrate that another property whose change is a reliable criterion of spontaneity needs to be sought. Work can be totally converted into heat, but the reverse is not possible. The energy obtained from a source of heat can only be partially converted into work, and then, only under certain conditions. Work is the concerted movement of many particles of matter under a macroscopic force, while heat seems more as chaotic molecular motions. Once work has been “degraded” to heat, only a fraction of the energy can be converted back to work in a cyclic process, (one in which the initial and final states are the same). It follows that the amount of heat in the universe increases as energy conversions take place. It seems, then, it might be possible to derive a property related to heat such that it would change in a given direction as processes spontaneously happen. A process in which the system releases heat to the surroundings is exothermic. If conducted at constant pressure, QP = )H. Since by the convention used in stating the first law heat released by the system has a negative sign, the )H of an exothermic process is negative. For a long time it was considered that this was a characteristic of spontaneous processes, but a consideration of the processes discussed in the previous paragraph in connection with )E and others shows that this is not the case. The dissolution of, e.g., magnesium sulfate in water, which is obviously spontaneous, is endothermic, as can be readily established by observing the drop in temperature of the system as the dissolution proceeds.
2nd Law - Entropy.
Since Q is not a property, the heat Q for
any change in state may have any value depending on the path followed by the
process and all differentials involving *Q
would be inexact, but *QREV
is defined because the path is defined. It can be shown that, although *QREV
is an inexact differential, *QREV
/ T is exact. Hence, this ratio can be used to define a new property. This new
property is called entropy (S) and defined as
(7)
If the definition used Q / T and *Q / T, the values of these fractions would
not be specified, i.e., Q and *Q
could have any values. Then the definition would be useless. Notice that *QREV
now has a specified value because the path of the process is being specified, but
does not become an exact differential. Earlier, with *QV
and *QP,
when the paths were specified (only expansion work with constant volume or
constant pressure, respectively) these differentials became not just specified
in value, but also functions of only properties of the state of the system and,
therefore, functions of state and exact differentials.
When a system and its surroundings are enclosed by a
boundary that prevents any exchange of matter, heat or any kind of work, the
larger system composed of the system of interest and its surroundings is said to
be isolated. The properties of entropy are such that, if a reversible process is
conducted within such an isolated enclosure, the total change in entropy is
zero, whereas if the process is spontaneous, the total change in entropy is
positive:
dSTOT = dSSYS + dSSUR $
0
(8)
Since the system undergoing a reversible process is always
at equilibrium, the equal sign in (8) also applies to a state of equilibrium.
So, for reversible processes dSTOT = 0 and dSSYS = - dSSUR.
As indicated before, the fact that the definition of
entropy involves QREV and not Q does not invalidate its application
to spontaneous (irreversible) processes because S is a property. This is one
reason why the concept of reversible processes is useful: it allows us to
express the change in entropy in a completely defined way, and this value is
true for any process that accomplishes the same change in state.
Applying the definition (7) to (8) we get
(9)
since the heat absorbed by the system must be equal to that
released by the surroundings when they together constitute an isolated system.
The temperatures of the system and surroundings need not be equal. In fact, if
they were equal we would have equilibrium and dSTOT = 0. This may
present another conceptual difficulty. If the temperatures were different, a
spontaneous transfer of heat would take place and the process would be
irreversible. How could we, then, conceive a reversible transfer of heat? This
problem could be obviated as follows: imagine a reversible process, such as the
displacement of a phase equilibrium (like the freezing of water at 0oC),
to go on in the surroundings in a manner that allows the reversible transfer of
the reversibly generated heat to the system which is at a lower temperature.
This way it is possible to unambiguously express the change in entropy for the
surroundings and the system even when their temperatures are different and the
process taking place in the system is irreversible.
An illustration of how the change in entropy is used to
show the direction of spontaneous processes is given by the following use of
equation (9) to predict the direction of the spontaneous flow of heat. Since the
total change in entropy is greater than zero for a spontaneous process,
(10)
If TSYS
> TSUR, 1/ TSYS
< 1/ TSUR and
(1/TSYS - 1/ TSUR) is negative. So,
in order for dSTOT to be >0,
*QREV must be negative, meaning
that the system loses heat to the surroundings. If
TSYS < TSUR,
*QREV
must be positive for dSTOT to be positive, i.e., heat flows from the
surroundings to the system. This, of course, is the same as saying that heat
flows from the hot region to the cooler one. But this is predicted by the second
law, not by the first.
The change in entropy of a system plus its surroundings,
when both together form an isolated system, constitutes an effective criterion
of spontaneity and of equilibrium. Entropy has the inconvenient, at times
serious, that its change for the surroundings needs to be evaluated. It would be
advantageous to find another property that, as entropy, always changes in the
same direction for spontaneous processes, but that, unlike entropy, shows this
behavior when its change is evaluated for the system with exclusion of the
surroundings. There are two such functions: Helmholtz free energy (A = E - TS)
and Gibbs free energy (G = H - TS). We will deal only with Gibbs free energy
whose differential is
dG = dH -TdS - SdT
(11)
Remembering that H = E + PV and that its differential is dH
= dE + PdV + VdP and substituting
dG = dE + PdV + VdP -T dS
- SdT
Next, we use the first law for a reversible change
dE = *QREV
- *WREV
dG = *QREV
- *WREV
+ PdV + VdP - TdS - SdT
(12)
and use equations (8) and (9), and the definition of
entropy from the second law to get
dSSYS = *QREV
/T
and assume that only expansion work is performed
*WREV
= PdV
Applying these two last results to the definition of dG,
dG = TdS - PdV + PdV + VdP -TdS - SdT
dG = VdP + SdT
(13)
for a reversible process with only expansion work.
Notice that all the properties and functions used here are
system properties and functions; there is no one that refers to the
surroundings. If the system could be doing work other than expansion work, the
work term in the statement of the first law needs to be split into expansion
work and other work. Then,
*WREV
= PdV + *W’REV
and, at constant temperature and pressure, dP and dT are zero and the change in G is equal to the maximum amount of work other than expansion that the system can do, i.e., if performed reversibly.
dG = - *W’REV
and, after integration between the initial and final
states,
)G = G2 - G1 = W’REV
(14)
Since most processes in biology take place at constant
temperature and pressure, calculation of their free energy change in undergoing
a specified finite change in state yields a measure of the maximum amount of non
expansion work that the system can perform on the surroundings while undergoing
that change. Maximum, because the work is being done reversibly. In spontaneous
natural processes where the work is done irreversibly, some of the free energy
lost by the system in doing the work would have to be spent against the
resistances or frictions encountered in any real change and will appear as heat.
The change in free energy would be the same whether the process is reversible or
not. (Why?). If W’REV
= 0, i.e., if no “other” work is done under conditions in which it could be
done during a reversible process at constant P and T, )G = 0 and the system is at equilibrium.
For example, if the Zn/Cu electrochemical cell used above in the section on
Process is not doing any electrical work, then the system is at equilibrium.
If P and T are not kept constant
dG = *
W’REV + VdP - SdT
(15)
and if only expansion work is done, we get again equation
(13)
dG = VdP + SdT.
Consider the free energy of an ideal gas. At constant T,
and Using VP = nRT,
dG = VdP = nRT(dP/P)
and
(16)
It is frequently convenient to express the free energy
content itself rather than its change. Since the absolute value of G cannot be
measured or calculated because, based only on the first and second principles of
thermodynamics it is not possible to define an absolute zero for G, it becomes
necessary to define a baseline state at which a mole of a substance i would have
a free energy content symbolized by Gi+ and called its standard
free energy per mole. This baseline or standard state for gases is defined
as P = P+ = 1 atmosphere. Then,
Gi = ni Gi+
+ ) Gi
in which
Gi = free energy of gas i at any pressure
) Gi = free energy change for going from the standard state to any other pressure at constant T
ni = number of moles of gas i present
Gi+ = standard molar free energy, or free
energy of one mole of i at the standard state.
Using equation (16),
Gi = ni Gi+
+ ni RT ln (Pi / Pi+)
(17)
The partial pressure of an ideal gas is
pi = ni (RT/V).
In a mixture of gases, the total pressure PT = G
pi = G
ni (RT/V). So,
pi / PT = ni / G
ni = Xi which
is the molar fraction of i.
An ideal gas in an expandable container at pressure PT
and temperature T may be made to expand isothermically by addition of other
gases at constant total pressure until its partial pressure is pi
. Then, the free energy change for this dilution is
)
Gi = ni RT ln ( pi / PT) = ni
RT ln (Xi /1)
(18)
Since the properties of an ideal gas are not altered by the
presence of other ideal gases, the first equality in equation (18) is also valid
for the isothermic expansion of the gas achieved by reduction of the external
pressure from PT to pi.
Ideal aqueous solutions are modeled as ideal gases and the
thermodynamic equations are the same for both. Instead of assuming no
interactions at all between molecules, they are assumed to interact equally with
solvent and other solute molecules. So, expression (18) for
) Gi
can be applied to aqueous solutions, but now this represents the free energy
change of diluting i from
X = 1 to any lower value. In other words, the standard state has changed
from P = 1 to X = 1, or pure substance, and the standard molar free energy is
represented by Gin.
Then,
Gi = ni Gin
+ ni RT ln (Xi / Xin)
(19)
in which Xin = 1.
Usually we work with concentrations expressed in molarity
units. For a binary solution (solvent A plus solute B),
XB = nB
/ nA + nB
and, since for dilute solutions nA >> nB,
XB ( nB / nA )
The molar concentration of B is CB = nB
/L of solution, but, from the above, nB / L (nA / L) · XB.
The number of moles nA in one liter of water at standard T and P is a
constant (55.56), so
CB = 55.56 · XB
molar. Then, substituting these values in (19) and indicating the corresponding
change in standard state (C o = 1M),
Gi = ni Gio
+ ni RT ln (C i /C o)
(20)
For a chemical reaction, the change in free energy ()G)
is given by
For the reaction A + B 6
C
)G = GC
- (GA +GB).
Using (20),
(21)
and, if the stoichiometry is as indicated in the reaction,
(22)
For convenience, the symbols for the concentrations in the
standard state of the various reactants and products are usually suppressed in
this equation, since their value is one. This practice should not lead us to
forget their implied presence. If not, the argument of the logarithmic function
may seem to have units of M-1, while it really is, as it must,
dimensionless. Then equation (22) may be written
(23)
When the concentrations of reactants and products and the
value of )G0
are known, the change in free energy for the reaction may be readily calculated.
At equilibrium )G
= 0, thus,
(24)
where the concentrations inside the parenthesis are
concentrations at equilibrium. Therefore, that fraction is equal to the
equilibrium constant for the reaction. This equation is very useful, since it
allows the calculation of the equilibrium constant when the )G0
is known and vice versa.
In dealing with transport across a membrane, the equations
are very similar. For example, for the diffusion of substance A, instead of
having different reactants and products we have a single substance at different
concentrations across the membrane. In the same way we use reactants and
products to indicate the direction being considered for the reaction, in
diffusion we one side of the membrane as the initial state and the other as the
final state. We could, for example, consider diffusion from inside the cell to
the outside. Then, )G
= GOUT - GIN, and, since the value of the standard molar
free energy is the same for a given substance no matter where it is, Equation
(23) would lose the )G0
term. The equation will look as follows
)G/mole = RT ln ( [A]OUT / [A]IN )