To Guillermo Cabrera Infante,
sleepless defender of freedom.
While he waited, a cigarette between his lips, some students asked him
facetiously about his ``anti-Castro'' stance. The man answered without
looking at them:
``Doctrine is one thing; the man, another. I believe that Fidel Castro
is the greatest leader that Latin America has produced.''
Surprise made the students' smiles vanish.
He continued: ``I don't exaggerate. In the long run, what did Simon
Bolivar accomplish? To confess, as he limped toward exile, that he had
`plowed the seas.' And Jose de San Martin? To seek exile in France and
refuse to return to Argentina ever again. And the others? To fragment the
hemisphere with republics that had no citizens, only constitutions that
served as fodder for the caudillos' horses.
``In turn, what has Fidel done? Fidel has done everything and has been
applauded for everything. That applause is a gauge of how low the ethical
level of our current politicians and intellectuals has fallen.
``In the academic world, far from shutting their doors to Cuban
professors -- not because they're professors but precisely because they
aren't, because Raul Castro himself anointed them as `servants' of the
regime -- some universities lower their standards to maintain their
leftist image.
``Others turn their learning centers into platforms where one hears
only the Cuban government's official version, never the repression or the
asphyxia suffered by the true intellectuals. My own university,
Georgetown, has one of those narrow-version learning centers.
``Fidel detests those hypocritical sinuosities. He attacks head on. He
invaded Latin America with his guerrillas and forced all to sacrifice
lives and fortunes in that struggle. Forty years later, the presidents of
those countries treat him with respect.
``He defied the north with annihilative Soviet rocketry, and when he
visits the United States, the TV networks melt under his charm. He shut
down Catholic schools, expelled priests and nuns, imposed atheism as the
sole truth -- and neither bishops nor cardinals whisper a protest.``As he
himself confessed, if he had achieved power in Spain, he would have
established an atheistic Inquisition to burn believers at the stake. If he
had met resistance, he would have proclaimed himself caliph and summoned
his Arab friends to re-establish order in Spain.
``He was unable to achieve such things, he proclaims, because the
people failed him. While his rebels defeated Fulgencio Batista's army in
two years, he says, the Colombian guerrillas have spent 20 years bleeding
Colombia without seizing power. In Bolivia, the peasants were deaf to Che
Guevara's cold words, and everywhere his guerrillas were defeated. Even
the Russian people betrayed him, toppling the bloodthirsty system that
nourished Cuba.
``Despite those costly disasters, Fidel went further and lower than
anyone else in Latin America. His formula is simple: rhetorical
concessions for foreign propaganda and a fist of steel to stay in
power.
``His words about the poor are a pretext to eliminate the rich and make
the poor miserable. Those who hunger think only about eating and cannot
hatch conspiracies. So his solution is not to improve the lot of those who
have nothing but to take everything away from those who have something.
``He and his brother Raul despise you. They know that you know the
truth and that you accept the lie to gain prestige as leftist
intellectuals.''
The students did not stay for the lecture.
Castro's `greatness'
THE REGIME'S `SERVANTS'
PEOPLE FAILED HIM
Copyright 2000 Miami Herald