Before asking about the U.S. embargo, however, ask us about the total
embargo imposed by our totalitarian state. Cubans don't trade with
anyone; only the government trades, and it's so repressive, it doesn't
permit us to participate in the nation's economic life.
People who have become ``the new entrepreneurs'' are leaders of Cuba's
single party -- the Communist Party -- officials of the New Rich, facing
an impoverished majority forbidden to own businesses. Free-lance workers
are hounded. Police will mistreat a blind man selling trinkets. They'll
stop and frisk someone carrying a bag with beans, fish, peanuts, bread --
anything that can be confiscated.
To the Cuban state, the economy is a mechanism for dominating families
and society. That's why the highest political leaders insist that ``there
will be no changes, not even when the embargo is lifted.'' Lifting the
embargo won't solve the problems of the Cuban people. Maintaining it, is
no solution, either.
Last month I talked with U.S. Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., Daniel Akaka,
D-Hawaii, and Max Baucus, D-Mont., and told them:
``You can't reduce the Cuban reality to a binary code of zeros and
ones, i.e. `Embargo Yes' and `Embargo No.' That's the wrong way to state
the problem. Placing Cuba's problems at the heart of U.S. policy and
attempting to link its solutions to changes is the Americanization of our
reality. What's needed is the de-Americanization of the Cuban problem and
its solution.
``It's not up to the United States to solve Cuba's problems, much less
to design details of its transition in the manner of the Helms-Burton Act,
which ought to be repealed.
``The embargo on medicine and food should be lifted at once. You can't
justify the embargo by saying it promotes peaceful changes in Cuba,
because it is incapable of doing so. On the other hand, those who say that
investment, tourism and cultural exchanges are ways to promote democracy
become participants in an unfair order, strengthening a regime that
alienates its own people.
``You ask if the solution lies with or without Fidel Castro, and you
wonder who will succeed him. This is what we call `Fidelization' of the
problems. What's needed is to `de-Fidelize' your vision of the Cuban
reality and to understand that the solution does not hinge on the will of
one man. It will come through a peaceful civil movement that is already
under way.
``We advocate the Varela Project, which calls for a referendum.''
I gave the senators a copy of the Varela Project, asking them to
distribute it to the U.S. Congress.
Those who respect self-determination must support the Cuban people's
right to be consulted via referendum on fundamental issues: changes in the
law to guarantee unequivocally freedom of speech and the right to
assemble, the right to own and run businesses, amnesty for political
prisoners, and truly democratic elections. These rights belong to Cubans
because we are human.
We shall go on with our struggle, whether or not Castro governs. We
shall struggle whether the embargo remains or is lifted. We shall struggle
until freedom and justice are brought to our homeland. That is the
Christian Liberation Movement.
Cubans in the diaspora should realize that people here support the
civil struggle for a referendum. The manifesto All United, signed by more
than 60 opposition and human-right groups inside Cuba, states: ``Many want
to speak for all Cubans. It's time to consult the Cuban people at the
polls, so they legally can decide what laws should rule their lives.''
Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas is head of the dissident Christian
Liberation Movement in Havana.
What do Cubans want?
Copyright 2000 Miami Herald