SYG 2000: Lecture 16. Chapter 6: Deviance and Social Interactionism

I. Deviance:any violation norms/rules;Chagnon:not act itself, but reactions to it make dev

  A. relativity of deviance: what deviant to some not to others; dif groups have dif norms

    1. Pokot of Kenya: adulterous men tied up by wife & female friends & beaten, kill ox

    2. ideal may not be real norms: Zapotec condemn adultery, yet not doing seen deviant

  B. crime: violation rules written down; in China, profiteering was crime result hanging

  C. stigma: characteristics that discredit people; violations of norms of ability/appearance

    1. eg. : blindness, deafness; facial birthmark, obesity; involuntary member: aids victim

  D. social order: a group’s customary social arrangements; lives based on, why dev threat

  E. social control: formal & informal means of enforcing norms

    1. negative sanctions: eg frowns/gossip for break folkways to jail/death for break more

      a. most are informal: eg stare at inappropriate clothing; gossip about infidelity

        i. shaming: >effective primary group uses; eg keep children in line

           1. urbanism undermines: loss sense community;pink underwear—sheriff use in jail

    2. positive sanctions: eg smiles/formal awardsn used reward for conforming to norms

    3. degradation ceremony: Harold Garfinkel (1956): formal attempt brand as outsider

      a. scarlet letter:Hester Prynne proclaimed moral outcast/”A” means “not one” of them

  F. term not a judgment:refer all violations rule,regardless seriousness/is relative to group

    1.marriage in Iraq is rape in Lincoln Nebraska:girls age13,14 married to men age 28,34

      a. charges: father charged with child abuse for arranging; husbands charged with rape

      b. front page news Saudi Arabia: people shake heads in disbelief; same in Licoln NE

    2. Hmong marriage by capture: try do so for fem in Fresno; courtship ideal strong men

      a. when have sex with her without her agreement, charged with rape

II. Competing Explanations of Deviance: Sociology, Sociobiology, and Psychology

  A. sociobiologists: look for answer within individuals; focus on genetic predispositions

    1. intelligence:  low intelligence leads to crime

    2. “XYY” theory: extra Y chromosome in males leads to crime

    3. body type: “squarish, muscular” bodies predispose street crime (mug/rape/burglary)

    4. theories not hold up well: eg most crimes commit by normal “XY” chromosome etc

  B. Psychologists: look at personality disorders; subconscious motives may drive to dev.

  C. sociologists: look for answers outside individuals; assume environmental influence

    1. eg: socialization/subcultural membership/SES; soc infl “recruit” people break norms

III. Symbolic Interactionist Perspective:act accord how interpret situations,not predispose

  A. Differential Association Theory: Edwin Sutherland: learn from dif groups assoc with

    1. “excess of definitions”: >of 1 than other if message mixed, tilt us to conform/deviate

    2. families: delinquents more likely come from families that get into trouble with law

       a. study 25000 delinquents (Beck et al. 1988): ½ w/ mom,dad,broth, or sis serve time

    3. neighborhoods: some develop subcultures in which killing considered honorable act

    4. mafia: to kill is a measure of manhood; concept of “honor” encourages deviance

        a. norms relative: for mafia, not to kill “squealer” is deviant because threaten group

  B. Control theoy (Walter Reckless): inner controls/morality (conscience/religion/ideas)

    1.disincline to deviate:includes fear punish/feeling of integrity/desire be “good person”

    2. outer controls: people—family/friends/police, who influence us not to deviate

    3. attachments: feeling affection/respect for people who conform to society’s norms

    4. commitments: having stake in society that you don’t want to risk, eg good job etc

    5. involvements: putting time/energy into approved activities

    6. beliefs: believing that certain actions are morally wrong

  C. Labeling Theory labels affect people’s own/others’ perception them, channel to dev

     1. techniques of neutralization: way think/rationalize that help deflect society’s norms

         Gresham Psyches & Davis Matza (19880: identify 5 techniques after study boys

            1. denial of responsibility: happened as accident or were victim of society

            2. denial of injury: claim no wrong because no one hurt; stealing cars=borrowing

            3. denial of victim: think self avenger: eg vandal teacher car avenge unfair grade

            4. condemnation of condemners: deny other’s right judge/”hypocrites”/”on take”

            5. appeal to higher loyalties: loyalty to gang more important than society’s norms