Lec 4. Chapter 2.
Theories
III. Structural Functionalism: families must stay intact to fulfill functions
1. threats to fam:change gender roles,increased dual-earner &single-parent fam
2. biological analogy: treats society as if living organism,
3. different subsystems: major institutions, e.g. fam, perform survival functions
a. functions: provides members for soc through procreation; socializes
4. gender division of functions: men work outside home & have instrumental
traits: competitive, cool, self-confidence, rationality; women expressive traits:
warmth, emotionality, nurturing, sensitivity, appropriate for inside home.
a. Efficient: each specializes, minimizing competition, duty conflict
5. Critique: theory not empirically testable, function of trad D of L efficiency or
subordination?, role reversal sometimes be more efficient?, is vital function lost
if schools take over socialization?, conser bias—nontrad roles dysfunct; too abstract
1.
4 sources of power:
a. legitimacy: belief that persons entitled to prevail by right
b. money: men have more than women
c. physical coercion: of children (spanking) and in abuse of women
d. love: can coerce (“if you loved me”) or be gift given to enhance rel
2 Critique: no talk of power of love/bonding& willing sacrifice; differences may
not lead to conflict but tolerated/appreciated; most fam conflict regulated
V. Men’s Studies: focuses how men’s experience shaped by masculinity or challenge to
a. Men overlooked: it is argued in the study of families
VI. Family Systems Theory:combo struc funct,symb interact for psychotherapeutic theo
1. 4 subsystems: spousal, parent/child, parental (rel to hus/wife parents), personal
2. separation: subsystems for family to function well; spousal conflict no spill over
child/parent; incest when parent go to child for spousal affection, etc.
3. critique: its basic concepts still in dispute: apply healthy fams outside clinincal
setting? E.g., healthy families seek homeostasis (theo) or well-being?
VII. Family Development Theory:examines 8 seq. stages;critique:downplays diversity