HOME
DISCUSSION SITE


PAPER GUIDELINES NOW AVAILABLE


Prof. Bruce Harvey
AML 5505 American Gothic: Tales of Paranoia, from Poe to Pynchon
Summer A 2005, Tuesdays & Thursdays 6:25-9:05, Biscayne Bay Campus


Biscayne Bay Office and Hours:
AC1 346, 305-919-5254
Mondays 10:00-12:00, Tuesdays 1:00-6:15, & Thursdays 5:30-6:15 and by arrangement
Home phone: 954-920-8938

 

harveyb@fiu.edu      


Gothic fiction and poetry originated in the middle of the eighteenth-century, and became a major part of Romantic era aesthetics.  In the American scene, one of the best early American novels--Wieland--is clearly within the Gothic tradition. 

However, this class will not be devoted to tracing lines of aesthetic affiliation, or even trying to define the Gothic: in part, because the reading list would be unmanageable (and would need to include many British works); and in part because literary genealogy can become all-too-academic in a bad sense.  So, although the course is about a genre--Gothic fiction--the genre won't preoccupy us too much.  Instead, let's work in the progress of the semester on developing a flexible vocabulary that will be useful in considering our texts but also others that you will read in the future: dread, the uncanny, inside/outside, dark interiority, hauntedness as a term pertaining to psychological structures of repression and revelation (as opposed to the supernatural).

 

The syllabus has also been designed to give you a quick survey of the development of American fiction from the beginning of the nineteenth-century to the postmodern now.


I am not an authority on Gothic literature, and so especially welcome your input and insights.  Throughout the course, although the focus is on fiction, we should all encourage each other to think broadly about aesthetic, psychological, philosophical, and cultural issues. 

 

I will give occasional lectures to fill in historical or cultural or theoretical context, but the bulk of class time will be devoted to discussion.  Besides introducing you to a fascinating area of study, a major goal of this course is to improve your analytical abilities--specifically, your ability to see how texts work rhetorically, aesthetically, and culturally.  Another major goal is to develop your skill and pleasure in communicating ideas, both in class and on paper. 


So that I know you've read this syllabus in its entirety, please email me saying "Read it."  That way, I will also get your current email address.

 

TEXTS ORDERED & AT THE BISCAYNE BAY BOOKSTORE

1. Edgar A. Poe, Fall of the House of Usher and Other Tales  
Signet Classics
ISBN: 0451526759

2. Herman Melville, Bartleby and Benito Cereno
Dover Publications (Thrift edition)
ISBN: 0486264734

3. Charlotte Perkins Gilman, The Yellow Wallpaper
Dover Publications (Thrift)
ISBN: 0486298574

4. Henry James, The Turn of the Screw (Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism)           
Ed.
Peter G. Beidler
Bedford/St. Martin's; 2nd edition (November 6, 2003)
ISBN: 0312406916

5. William Faulkner, Absalom, Absalom!
Vintage; Reissue edition (January 30, 1991)
ISBN: 0679732187

6.  Flannery O’Connor, Three by Flannery O’Connor
Signet Classics; Reissue edition (August 21, 1986)
ISBN: 0451525140
 

 

7. Postmodern gothic novel that the class will choose

GRADE PERCENTS, ASSIGNMENT DATES, & ESSAY ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES


20%     =    In-class participation

20%     =    Discussion board participation
10%     =    Book review

50%     =    Essay final version   PAPER GUIDELINES--NOT READY


June 4:    1/2 page single-spaced statement of your essay topic (or desire to do the theory alternative)

June 10:   Essay draft

June 17:   Book review
June 21:   Compilation of on-line discussion entries

June 24:   Essay final version

 



 

ASSIGNMENTS & POLICIES

 

Class Participation:  Missing class, especially as a graduate student, is very poor form: please don't do it.  If you miss more than two days, you will not be able to pass the course. A graduate-level seminar is not simply a more intense 4000-level undergraduate course.  I look upon you as a potential teacher or colleague-in-the-making and thus, although I'm still leading the class, democracy more or less rules.  This means that while typically I will have an agenda, I also want and encourage the class to veer off into other illuminating avenues.  I expect more active and regular participation than in an undergraduate class.  Passivity on your part--always waiting for me to guide you to important passages and points--is inappropriate.  A high degree of intellectual inquisitiveness and resourcefulness is assumed of all students in a graduate seminar.

 

Discussion Threads:  I will set up the discussion thread web-link (only the class can access it) the first week.  You may initiate topics/threads or respond to topics I or other students propose. You should submit and read postings routinely, but I don't want this to become just busy work for you.  Think of it as a chance to exchange ideas about our readings informally.  And, as with any dialogue or class discussion, sometimes you will have a lot to say (a nice meaty paragraph) and sometimes you won't have much to say at all.  Sometimes you will engage the entire class; other times you and another student will have a sidebar exchange.  Checking and submitting postings twice a week should suffice. Please try, once a main topic has been initiated, to keep responses and kindred topics subordinate to it; otherwise, the mechanism gets unruly to navigate.  Also, keep current.  If you respond to a topic that is two weeks old, it will be buried in the thread trail.  Lively debate is fine; but be polite and avoid vulgarities.  Please do not get personal.  Respectable grammar, spelling, and sentence style are expected.

About midway through the semester, I'll give you feedback about whether your online discussion up to that point equals an "A," "B," and so forth.   And you can always ask me how you are doing.  If the online discussion creates awkwardness for you in any form, please talk to me and we'll work the problem out.

 

At the end of the semester, cut-and-paste/print out all of your significant contributions, and submit them to me in sequence.  In effect, such will be a journal of your interactions with the readings/films.

Instructions for logging on to the discussion site:


1. Click on the "Discussion Site" link at the top of this syllabus (www.bruceharvey.pageout.net), and click on our class & your group.  If the class is large, I'll divide the discussion site into two or more sections.

2. Click on "Student Registration" and follow the directions, using the class password at the end of the registration fields (not to be confused with your personal password that you will choose in a moment).  The class password is ___________.   If you do not enter a unique user ID and personal password, you will have to enter both items again along with the class password.  The class password may not be needed.

3. Write down your user ID and personal password here (or somewhere): ______________ ____________.

4. Click on "Discussion Area".

5. Click on "Enter Discussion Area".

6. Login.  Cookies must be enabled in your browser.

7. Leave a posting.

8. When you are at home doing this, you can create a favorite link to the actual discussion page.  All you will need to do, then, is to enter the your login user ID and password.

 

 

Book Review:  The goal of the summary is to present a digest or review of a scholarly book about or related to one of our authors: a biography, a work of literary-cultural interpretation, or a theoretical volume.  This should be between one and two single-spaced pages, and written in a format and style kindred to what you would find in an academic journal (I will give examples or recommend journals to look at).  Although short, this should be a showpiece--your very best, impeccable writing.  It will be due several weeks before the end of the semester, and put online to share with your fellow students.

 

Analytical-Research Paper:  You can write on any of the texts we are reading, and you can--if you have an interest and experience--write on a film we will be watching.  Your topic  need not be related to the "Gothic."  I assign a grade to the draft, which is less a mark of the "quality" of your draft than of how much remains to be done to produce a successful essay.  As early as possible--in the context of the compressed summer semester, the second class!-- tell me what you are interested in, so I can help guide you. The essay should be about fifteen pages long or longer, double-spaced.  It must incorporate a decent amount of secondary research: historical-cultural, biographical, and/or critical.  Longer essay guidelines and tips and citation method/bibliographic format are provided at the link above in the Grade Percent green box. 

Here are some topic possibilities:

 

--Analyze one Poe's short story (perhaps one not discussed in class), but do so in the context of other Poe stories. 

 

--Analyze the difference between a first and second reading of Melville's Benito Cereno (you might want to use what is known a reader-response theory).

 

--Provide a long critique of the essays analyzing James' Turn of the Screw in our Bedford edition.

 

--Interpret Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper" in the context of 19th-century theories of female hysteria/neurasthenia.

 

--Figure out what it means for The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom! to be linked via Quentin Compson.

 

--Explore (metaphysically, narratologically, psychologically) the abrupt shocks of revelation in several O'Connor stories.  Or, analyze some recurring motif in several of her stories.

 

--For those who have an interest in popular culture, you may analyze a TV-show that has elements of the gothic (which may be broadly interpreted: e.g., "CSI: Miami" is technoglitz-gothic, all about postmodern techno-surfaces and visceral revelations).

 

Theoretical Alternative:  Buy an introductory literary theory book (I will consult with you), read it in its entirety, and then submit a 15 page review of how three or four theories might be applied to one of our texts, a mini-version of the Turn of the Screw critical volume in effect.  For those who have a particular interest in film this assignment can be modified so that you can use film theory. 

 

Miscellaneous:
 

There is no final exam.


 

 

SYLLABUS
 

E-texts = materials you should print out and bring to class.

 

Underneath the class date, I will occasionally put links to websites relevant to the issues/texts of the week or to my lecture/review notes or to ProjectMuse/JSTOR articles (these are articles in scholarly journals, available online through FIU's library) relevant to our readings. You do not need to print them out.   These will be posted intermittently, and for stuff you should read for a particular class, I'll put up the links at least a week in advance.

In the syllabus listings per se (right main column) I will post miscellaneous updates in red.

 Class 1:
 May 9

"Call"#1 review

"Call"#2 review

   Intro to course: syllabus and policies
   Film: faux Lovecraft film, "The Call of Cthulhu"

 Class 2:
 May 11
 

Absalom, Absalom! story summary

No class: reading break--read Absalom, Absalom!

You may find the plot summary to the left useful, as you embark on A,A! There is also a brief chronology in the back of our edition.

 Class 3:
 May 16


Wiki. Encyclo. on gothic
 

Read 1st several pages ONLY of this

 

Master of the Dark Sublime: Poe Stories


"Marginalia (The Veil of the Soul)," "To Helen," "Annabel Lee," "The Poetic Principle,"  "The Oval Portrait"
(e-texts)

"The Tell-Tale Heart" & "The Black Cat" (in our edition of Poe)

See the Wiki. article to the left for a quick overview of gothic tradition/genre.  See PDF scholarly article's first several pages ONLY for additional background on what Gothic is.  (I put up this article, also, to keep American Psycho on the list as a possible final postmodern novel for us to read.)

 Class 4:
 May 18
 

E.S. on gothic

Prof's Poe Review

Master of the Dark Sublime: Poe Stories

 

"The Purloined Letter," "Murders in the Rue Morgue," "The Fall of the House of Usher," & "Manuscript Found in a Bottle"

To the left is an excerpt from Eve Sedgwick's book Between Men.  It elaborates a theory in her Gothic Conventions that gothic novels express homophobic paranoia and homosexual/homosocial desire.  She is quite brilliant, although the excerpt may not make sense out-of-context and is only indirectly related to Poe (perhaps!).  It will be useful to read and ponder her thesis as a theoretical possibility to explicating Melville's "Benito Cereno," for next week.  Melville's novella parodies/elaborates homosocial panic and attraction (as does much of his fiction--the relation b/w Claggart and Billy in Billy Budd, for example). 

 

The other link is to my undergraduate lecture notes for Poe.  PLEASE NOTE: IN A GRADUATE CLASS I DO NOT WORRY TOO MUCH ABOUT WHETHER THE DISCUSSION PROCEEDS IN A ORDERED SEQUENCE--ASSOCIATION AND A "JAZZ" LIKE STRUCTURE IS FINE.   IT IS IMPORTANT, HOWEVER, FOR YOU TO READ MY REVIEW NOTES WHERE I TRY TO CHART OUT THE ISSUES MORE TIDILY!

 Class 5:
 May 23

Melville Biography
 

READ THIS PAGE AFTER YOU READ "BENITO"-No need to memorize the details, but note how clever/ politically sensitive Melville has been in selecting names.  Melville's story was based on a actual ship revolt, and much of the deposition at the end is drawn liberally from court documents .


Read this after you finish "Benito".  This essay relates the camera gaze in film to the narrative gaze in Melville's story
 

Benito Review Notes

 

Racial Paranoia & Captivity

Melville, “Benito Cereno”
Paul Bowles, "A Distant Episode" (handout)

Melville's work is relatively short, but extremely dense.  Fascinating, but not an "easy" read.  It has a mystery-novel structure; what you discern the first time reading it differs from what you discern the second time.  After you complete it the first time go back and re-read the opening several scenes, the scene in which Babo is shaving Cereno, and the concluding ship-battle scene.  Then at random read several pages/scenes and note the difference the second time around.

 

To the left are links to Melville's life/works, background to "Benito," and an analysis of "Benito" using film-theory--the latter because a) it's a reasonably good essay on "Benito," b) it's a model essay of sorts, for what you should be aspiring towards, and c) some of you may be interested in writing on a film.

 

Last to the left: my undergraduate review notes.





 

Class 6:
May 25

Critical YWP essay

Gilman's statement

 

Gilman bio.

Female 'Hysteria':

Gilman, “The Yellow Wallpaper”

The first link takes us to an online only essay that is very earnest and useful.  I suggest that you do not print it out, but read/skim online.  In class I want to briefly consider this essay as a model of a certain type of close reading or scrupulous "over attention," by which I mean not a jibe at the author, but a reflection on what it means to linger longer on literary texts.  Why would we want to do this?  Are such readings kindred to the low-level sight of Poe's dullard police?  

The next is Gilman's reflections on why she wrote her story.

 

Finally, a brief bio. of Gilman.

 Class 7:
 May 30
 

Female 'Hysteria':    

 

Film: Hitchcock, “Rebecca”--at Bruce's house in Hollywood (map & directions here)

 

Theoretical essay on Lacan and Hitchcock (handout given at previous class meeting) TO BE HANDED OUT THIS TUESDAY NIGHT

 

PAPER GUIDELINES NOW AVAILABLE

 

 

BOOK REVIEW GUIDELINES: The guidelines--besides what's on the syllabus: 1-2 pages single-spaced; flawless style (as if you were submitting it as a review to be published)--are a) summary of the argument/content of the work, b) critical assessment pointing out strengths and weaknesses. Those can be done in tandem, or a) can go before b). If you were really writing a review, and knew the subject matter well, you'd have also a prefatory paragraph that puts the work in a larger context of kindred works... but I'm not expecting that. It's good to have a couple of key quotes to exemplify good points or bad points or crucial terminology.  Get next meeting a journal or 2 from me, which will have sample reviews. They come in all shapes and sizes, so there's a lot of flexibility... but style has to persuade, too.

 

 

 Class 8:
 June 1



 

Female 'Hysteria':

James, Turn of the Screw

 

PAPER GUIDELINES NOW AVAILABLE


BOOK REVIEW GUIDELINES: The guidelines--besides what's on the syllabus: 1-2 pages single-spaced; flawless style (as if you were submitting it as a review to be published)--are a) summary of the argument/content of the work, b) critical assessment pointing out strengths and weaknesses. Those can be done in tandem, or a) can go before b). If you were really writing a review, and knew the subject matter well, you'd have also a prefatory paragraph that puts the work in a larger context of kindred works... but I'm not expecting that. It's good to have a couple of key quotes to exemplify good points or bad points or crucial terminology.  Get next meeting a journal or 2 from me, which will have sample reviews. They come in all shapes and sizes, so there's a lot of flexibility... but style has to persuade, too.

Email me a 1/2 page single-spaced statement on your essay topic (or desire to do the theory alternative) no later than June 4. 


 Class 9:
 June 6

Female 'Hysteria':

SUMMARY OF LAST SESSION (semi-Lacanian):

 

Here's the passage, Exodus 33, I mentioned in class.  Melville in MDick uses it in the context of not knowing the whale's intent/interior, only his tail, which in turn is a analogy for not knowing primal, original truth; all truth is known obliquely, in the fallen hazards and delights of language.  One of the BIG points about Melville's tale "Bartleby, the Scrivener," is that Bartleby's melancholia derives from his working in the Dead Letter Office, where communication (letters of mercy and love) never reaches its destination.

 

20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.

21 And the LORD said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock:

22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by:

23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.

 

Gothicism's syntax is almost always a movement towards the unspeakable, a dark route, as it were, to the limit of language and its referential capabilities.  Psychoanalytically, separation from mommy is the primary loss, which speech attempts to rescind through the naming of what is absent; but alas speech is always ruled by protocol/law/Father, so speech can never do its primal task of recovering union, of suturing the wound of parturition. So writers of a certain metaphysical habit (Romantic age writers, and James although he seems on the surface to be part of the Realist era), try to thwart language by using language: metaphorical excess, satirizing the inarticulate or illiterate placidity of Mrs. Grose, the gaps in the dialogue-exchanges, performative language (Flora's stabbing words); or by creating a ghost story the content of which reverts to the obscene and unsayable; or by foregrounding the materiality of language (the letters) rather than what language is supposed to transparently point to. More difficult to convey, is the unheimlich/uncanny aspect of Turn of the Screw: we did not get to the spatial dynamics, a category on the board, but it seems that the gaze over long distances b/w governess and ghost defines a space of abrupt muteness, of stillness, where (after all the yakking mentally of the governess) the scene is briefly hollowed of the capacity for speech in the first place.  Were the governess secured within a bourgeois home, rather than a mansion haunted by paternal absence, language would not be able to take these unseemly, uncanny, and excessive and hysterical/promiscuous routes.  One of the great effects of Turn is the story takes on its greatest depth--not by exploring interiors--but by expanding the cavernous interior outward, so that the cinematically-rich shots b/w ghost and governess happen over open spaces typically that (per above) are uncannily not quite open in the sense of "landscape", but rather are criss-crossed by gazes that suggest foul intimacy, knowing looks beyond words (if you buy the governess's interpretation).  Perhaps what makes the postmodern American Psycho disingenuous gothic is that it denies these interior/exterior admixtures or conflations or threshholds: there is no visceral knowledge (even CSI fashion) to complement the surface style; whereas Cronenberg truly is gothic, albeit also postmodern.   A note: one of the problems with theory--which I've sort of applied in this paragraph--is that every story tends to become just a vehicle to articulate theory (i.e. the "bad" essay on "Yellow Wallpaper").  I've taken the categories we had on the board, emphasizing some/ignoring others, to create a very typical and predictable Lacanian reading.  I more or less "believe" what I just wrote, but it also gets glib.  To avoid glibness, if I were going to translate the above into a real essay on Turn, I would  look at specific scenes much more intensely as being "symptomatic"; not quite close reading in the New Critical sense, but close in the sense of maintaining some palpable fidelity to the text/story, rather than launching so quickly into theory spinning.  I'd also try to bring in some history, other cultural documents, etc., to balance abstraction against the specificity of real people in real time.  P.S. my points  about chat-online flirtation has little to do with gothic, except that flirtation is a discourse that fascinatingly (as does Gothic) trades on boundaries/transgressions of boundaries, of the revealed/not revealed, and of the mobility of desire (e.g., desire needs to be mirrored in the Other in some fashion). 

Here is an apt blog description of James' hyper-nuanced style that relates to paranoia and a comment made in class about flirtation sometimes being a one-side projection of desire: 
http://www.dhalgren.com/Blog/?m=200406

 

James, Turn of the Screw, background material and critical essays in our edition:

 

--"Modern Spiritualism..." pages 15-19: READ as it is important to know that James' contemporaries took such matters seriously

--Cultural Documents section pages 123-86: SKIM, and I mean SKIM (15 minutes should do it)
--Critical essays 254-349: BUT SKIM prefatory summaries of psychoanalytical, gender, marxist criticism and concentrate on the actual essays on "Turn."  DO NOT assume they are model essays, however; I will point out what I take to be exemplary.

 

Paper writing tips & how to integrate theory into your paper

 Class 10:
 June 8

No class: paper writing break and conferences as needed

Email me a draft of your essay (or 15 page theory assignment) by June 10.

 Class 11:
 June 13
 

Prof. Quick Notes on A,A

 

Internet academic essay on Poe stories we read and Faulkner's A,A!.

Dark Houses of the South:

Faulkner, Absalom, Absalom!  (we'll discuss the first 1/2)

CUT Handout: C. Porter essay on Faulkner's A, A! for June 15 class.

 Class 12:
 June 15


 

Faulkner, A, A! continued (we'll discuss the second 1/2)

 

CUT Handout for this class: C. Porter essay on Faulkner's A, A!

Email by June 17 the book review, and post at the same time on PAGEOUT under the discussion thread I provide. 

 Class 13:
 June 20

O'Connor Short Story Plots


 

The Hidden God:
 

Get Lovecraft Handout for next/last class


O’Connor short stories: "Everything That Rises Must Converge," "Greenleaf," "A View of the Woods," "The Comforts of Home," "Revelation," and "Judgment Day"

 

Also read parts I & II of the editor's intro. (Part III gets too detailed interpretively vis-a-vis the short stories)

 

See the plot summaries to the left--review quickly before you come to class.

 

Prof. Summary: Sometimes I talk about the terms the "sublime" and "the wound" to organize my thoughts about literary/aesthetic/psychoanalytical issues (the sublime = transcendental epiphany, atemporaral being, and so forth; wound = absence, loss, lack, our idiosyncratic particularity, perhaps political/psychological resentment; but also all scars, bodily or textual or psychological.  The wound, most simply, equals all the contingencies of time; the sublime, being beyond time.  In "Yellow Wallpaper" the ugly wallpaper could represent the flesh's ailments; and her going thru the wallpaper, the conversion of the flesh into the feminist acceptance of the body and its liberation (as it were).

 

O’Connor’s absolutely devout Catholicism--the sense that worldly experience is only a prelude to or a material manifestation of spiritual mysteries (the violence of grace in particular)--inverts or transforms my terms.  In O’Connor’s universe the wound (let us call it our grotesque/gothic particularity) is either a sign of our fallenness or a sign of radically interrupting grace.   The violent penetration of grace equals both punishment and redemption or illumination.  The "wound" for me evokes humanistic, secular empathy; for O’Connor it is a visionary/fleshy conduit unto God’s sublimity.  When I read her I get confused because I cannot quite reconcile my way with her way.  (Which is not to say that I don’t understand her when she’s hilariously puncturing smugness, etc.)

 

A theme in the class is whether violence is merely lurid; metaphysical insofar as pain/violence is "unspeakable"; a revelation of the inside of the body, and thus fundamentally taboo; or existential, in the sense that the syntax of narrative moving towards bodily horror guarantees authenticity (when we feel the "flesh" is all-too-real).

 

 

Email or turn in by June 21 a compilation of your substantial online contributions. 

Course Evaluations

 Class 14:
 June 22

Uncanny in Horror Film Online Essay (don't need to read; for future classes)
 

Lovecraft's horror story credo

 

Urban-Hip, Contemporary, or Postmodern Paranoia:
Hidden God continued

Lovecraft story xerox (if handed out in previous class)
Film to be selected; to be watched in class: Alien

 

McCormac, Blood Meridian or Pynchon, Crying of Lot 49 or graphic comic novel (class will decide)


Email me the final version of your essay (or 15 page theory alternative) by June 24.


 

Film night and dinner party at professor's house, Sat. or Sun, 24th or 25th