South Pacific/Prof. Harvey

 

TYPEE STUDY/REVIEW SHEET

 

Dear students: ponder the sequence of review questions below.  Tip: if you follow the sequence below, you could perhaps get a topic and sequence of ideas/stages of analysis for your paper. 

 

Concentrate on what I said in class about the oddity of the beginning and end of the narrative (the dedication to Mr. Law/authority, Melville’s father-in-law judge; and the Appendix about an iron-handed ship commander, an “idol,” whom the crew adores!) and the narrative itself which is about (once Tommo gets over his paranoia) pleasure.  Tommo at one point even quotes Rousseau about the delights of a “healthy, physical existence” (find the passage and I’ll give you a book prize!).

 

 

Why does Tommo flee?         

--how is Captain Vangs described?

--is Tommo’s body, as it were, happy aboard ship?

--is there law on ship?

                                               

What are some of the virtues of the Typees, according to Tommo?

--property?

--neurosis?

--what is their morality based on?

--are they into progress?

 

What are some of the negative features?

--do they understand their own past? Or culture?

--is there individualism?

--is taboo/tattooing a choice?

--Kory-Kory in jail passage

 

You know your culture’s laws (they are written down somewhere); how do the Typees know their laws? 

--does Tommo think the Typees have (rational) laws?

--when does Tommo get a headache?

 

If basic story is: flee tyranny, only to discover a different tyranny, what is the point of the Appendix?

 

SUMMARY OF NON-WRITTEN NATIVE LAW

 

Typee “common-sense law”      = law of the heart: precepts graven on every breast

complex taboo law                     =too complex for Tommo so he dismisses it/mocks it as superstition, etc.

complex taboo law                     =gothic paranoia, because cannibal rites part of taboo system

                                                =he always gets a headache when he thinks about native law      

=Tommo almost has an anthropological desire to know the “other”, but perhaps what he fears is that native/taboo law will turn out to be wall-to-wall law.  We in the “west” can obey or disobey the law; but Kory-Kory almost instinctively follows the dictums of his culture.  He is, as a student said in class, “imprisoned by his own culture”—but does not know it!

 

(P.S. law exists in several forms: internalized authority (guilt); written law/statute books; police authority; ritualized, non-written law.  You feel guilty if you don’t stop at the stop sign; Florida state law says you must stop at the stop sign; you’ll be issued a traffic ticket if you don’t stop; you don’t get into the canoe if you are a woman because you don’t get into a canoe if you are a woman… ritual/dogma/truths that don’t require explanation or justification.)