American
Romanticism/Fall 2010
Prof. Bruce Harvey
FINAL EXAM: TAKE HOME SYNTHESIS ESSAY DUE DECEMBER
8 MIDNIGHT
You
will not get feedback because this essay exam is being submitted at the end of
the semester. If you have a question about your grade or overall course
grade, contact me early Spring 2011 semester. If there is some urgent and
compelling reason to get in touch immediately after the due date of the Final
Exam, however, please of course do so.
WHEN:
--The Synthesis Essay is due December 8 by midnight, via email, to
harveyb@fiu.edu.
--Turn it in single-spaced, with your name, question/option, etc., at a top
corner; no cover pages, please.
--If I do not reply within 24 hours, “Got it,” it means I didn’t get it.
WHO:
--You write it: no Wikipedia excerpts, no snippets from a website here, a
website there. You! No outside sources are allowed; plagiarism will
conclude in an "F" for the course.
--Do not directly rely upon my online lectures; you will not succeed if you
just mimic or paraphrase the lectures.
HOW:
--The
essay should be about two or more pages SINGLE-SPACED. Do not pad—this is a bad
strategy.
Especially do not have an opening paragraph that spins-its-tires in abstract
profundity: "As long as humankind has endured, the ages have been witness
to...." Get to the point, so your orientation/focus is immediately
known.
--You may include several brief quotes to show that your ideas are anchored in
specific texts (showing me that you've read them!), not just a product of your
generalized memory of the course's texts (or my online lectures!). But
don’t use up a lot of space quoting.
--Effective organization, a decent style and clean grammar/punctuation, &
lots of thoughtfulness are expected.
--About organization: generally speaking, it is best to discuss each
author/text in turn (for example, 1st 5th devoted to Emerson, 2nd 5th devoted
to Poe, 3rd 5th devoted to Douglass, etc.), with comparative loop-backs (e.g., “unlike Poe, Douglass
is concerned with literal liberty …").
However, you also need to show you have synthesized our
readings/the issues: four or five separate mini-essays on four or five authors,
strung together, will not be highly rewarded.
--Whether you deal with four authors only (1/2 single-spaced page per author,
roughly) or deal with more depends upon what insights/connections you provide.
You might discuss four authors a fair amount, and just throw in references here
and there to several others. Some of our authors/texts might more complexly
explore/reflect an issue than another, and so it is up to you to determine the
proportions of your essay devoted to this author or that author.
--Bottom line: I look for a complex, sophisticated understanding of a
representative sample of our readings. I most definitely do not have a “right”
answer in mind for any of the questions; there are many ways of answering
each. I do not grade looking for what points you have not made; I grade by assessing
the insight demonstrated in the points you do make.
WHAT:
--Choose
four or more of our authors, distributed more or less from the beginning to the
end of the course, to answer one of the following questions. Note the
open-ended first question:
1) If you have a self-selected theme/issue that you feel adequately and
importantly encompasses four or more of our authors, you may pursue it as long
as you, via email, get an “ok” from me ahead of time.
2)
Is it accurate to divide American Romantic authors up into "light"
(optimistic") ones and "darker" or "gothic" ones?
3) Would you say American Romanticism celebrates the individual?
4) Does American Romanticism typically wall-out the political or social?
5) Is American Romanticism (given its metaphysical tendencies) capable of
addressing racial conflict? (Note: this is a variant or subset of question #4…
so if you respond to question#4 decide whether you want to embrace aspects of
this question#5).