Important
events in the history of life
Paleogeographic
Map <http://www.scotese.com/precambr.htm>
Methanothermus
sp. Courtesy Karl Stetter. It is believed that life
on earth made its appearance in the seas during Archaean . The first life
is believed to be the Eubacteria
(i.e., bacteria prokaryotic organisms). The most accepted
theory is that the Eubacteria are the ancestors of the members
of the Domain Arachaea which includes organisms that can exist
in extremely hostile environments such as thermal vents and hypersaline
water. However, not all Archaeans are extremophiles , and,
in fact, this domain is extremely diverse, and only recently being studied
using genomic and proteomic methods. The earliest bacteria obtained energy
through chemosynthesis (ingestion of organic molecules). They represent
the oldest fossils that go back to about 3500 mya , and are known
as bacterial microfossils. Archaeans are single-celled creatures
that join bacteria to make up a category of life called the Prokaryotes
(pro-carry-oats)
.
Prokaryotes' genetic material, or DNA, is not enclosed in a central cellular
compartment called the nucleus. Bacteria and Archaea
are the only prokaryotes. All other life forms are Eukaryotes (you-carry-oats)
,
creatures whose cells have nuclei. (Note: viruses are not considered true
cells, so they don't fit into either of these categories.). However, while
archaeans resemble bacteria and have some genes that are similar
to bacterial genes, they also contain other genes that are more like what
you'd find in eukaryotes. Furthermore, they have some genes that aren't
like any found in anything else. View
the difference between Prokaryots and Eukaryotes
The hypothesized process by
which prokaryotes gave rise to the first eukaryotic cells is known as endosymbiosis
<http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/_0/endosymbiosis_03>
The term was coined by Margulis: Lynn Margulis (born 1938) is a biologist
and a professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. In 1967 she
proposed a contentious new hypothesis which became her most important scientific
contribution as the endosymbiotic theory of the origin of mitochondria
as separate organisms that long ago entered a symbiotic relationship with
eukaryotic cells through endosymbiosis. After the proposal of the endosymbiotic
theory, Margulis predicted that if organelles were prokaryotic symbionts,
then the organelles will have their own DNA that would be different from
the DNA of the cell. This prediction was actually proven in the 1980's
in mitochondria,
centrioles, and chloroplasts.
These earliest fossils display
what appear to be chemical signs of delicate chains of microbes that appear
exactly like living blue-green algae (known as cyanobacteria ). For
billions of years these bacteria formed extensive slimy carpets in shallow
coastal waters, and before the end of Achaean about 2.5 bya
they had also formed a thin crust on land. The structures that these bacteria
formed are know as stromatolites,
these accretionary growth structures produced by the prokaryotes,
and also possibly Arachaeans and primitive Eukaryotes, became increasingly
abundant during the Archaean, a fact of critical importance to the
later evolution of life. However, an alternate hypothesis postulates that
eukaryotes may have appeared in the late Archaea. Stromatolitic
structures span the Precambrian and extend to modern time, though they
are currently limited to several isolated environments.More information
on Stramatolites
<http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Tree_of_Life/Stromatolites.htm>
The
atmosphere that existed during Archean
time would be toxic to most extant life on our planet. Also, rocks were
just beginning to form at the crust of the earth. The atmosphere was very
different from what we breathe today; at that time, it was likely a reducing
atmosphere of methane, ammonia, and other gases which would be toxic to
most life on our planet today. Also during this time, the Earth's crust
cooled enough that rocks and continental plates began to form.
Visit
this site <http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/bacteria/bacteriafr.html>
to gain an understanding of the Archaean biota.
When these microscopic organisms were first discovered
(in 1977), they were considered bacteria. However, when their ribosomal
RNA was sequenced, it became obvious that they bore no close relationship
to the bacteria and were, in fact, more closely related to the eukaryotes
(including ourselves!) For a time they were referred to as archaebacteria
, but now to emphasize their distinctness, we call them Archaea .
They have also been called Extremophiles
in recognition of the extreme environments in which they have been found:
4H2
+ CO2 -> CH4 + 2H2O Methanogens
are the most common and widely dispersed of the Archaea
being found in anoxic sediments and swamps, lakes, marshes, paddy fields,
landfills, hydrothermal vents and sewage works as well as in the rumen
of cattle, sheep and camels, the cecae of
horses and rabbits, the large intestine of dogs and humans, and in the
hindgut of insects such as termites and cockroaches. Two methanogens
have had their complete genomes sequenced are:Methanococcusjannaschii
and Methanobacteriumthermoautotrophicum
The Archaea: have
a diverse variety of shapes and exist not only as rods and dots (cocci)
like bacteria but also as triangles, discs, plates and cup-shapes. Archaea
was originally thought to be just like bacteria, but archaea
is a much different and simpler form of life. It may also be the
These Archaea species live in extreme heat near deep sea vents.
Image
courtesy of NOAA
The Euryarchaeota
There are four
main types: (1) Methanogens (meth-an-oh-jins ) —
archaeans that produce methane gas as a waste product of their "digestion,"
or process of making energy. (2) Halophiles ( hal -oh-files) —
those archaeans that live in salty environments. (3) Thermophiles
(ther -mo-files) — the archaeans that live at extremely hot temperatures.
(4) Psychrophiles (sigh-crow-files)—those
that live at unusually cold temperatures.
1. Methanogens
2. Halophiles
3. Thermoacidophiles
The Crenarchaeota
The Crenarchaeota
are a smaller group than the Euryarchaeota
which contains the majority of the known Archaea.
The Crenarchaeota are primarily found in
extreme environments either hot ones or cold ones. Little is known about
the cold adapted species except that they live in considerable numbers
- 104 per ml. They are found in the Antarctic and probably the
Many like it acid as well as hot and live in acidic sulfur springs at a pH as low as 1 (the equivalent of dilute sulfuric acid). These use hydrogen as a source of electrons to reduce sulfur in order to get the energy they need to synthesize their food (from CO2).
One member of the group, Aeropyrum pernix, has had its genome completely sequenced.
Other members of this group seem to make up a large fraction of the plankton in cool, marine waters; the microbes in soil that convert ammonia into nitrites (nitrification ).
Planets which contain an environment wherein archaea might survive include Venus, the past environment of Mars, Jupiter, Saturn , and Jupiter's moon Io .
Thermophiles and biotechnology: the
Termus
aquaticus case
An emerging
new fieled of applied reserach has developed in the last decade, that is
biotechnology. The use heat resistant microbe to unravel the way on how
to copy DNA and amplify it using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This
type of research finds wide use in medical diagnosis (AIDS, for instance)
and forensics (DNA fingerprinting) and has become the basis of a $300,000,000
industry. So the Yellowstone Park that had been justly famous for its wildlife,
it is now becoming famous for the incredibly small, amazingly versatile
microbes that are found in such profusion here, and which are so rare elsewhere.
Taken
from: Ediacara Biota, ancestors of Modern
Life or evolutionary dead end <http://geol.queensu.ca/museum/exhibits/ediac/ediac.html>Notes on the
Classification of Organisms
Organismal
diversity is the product of evolution.
Evolutionary
paths are branched and numerous, though most arrive at dead ends with organisms
which do not survive environmental change. We will consider these evolutionary
paths (called lineages), and the processes that carry organisms along
them.
While the
lineage of any given organism may have twisted repeatedly according to
the whims of chance and change, key nodes may nevertheless be tracked retrospectively.
These nodes consist of times of identifiable change, particularly points
of divergence between two lineages (speciation events). The delineation
of these nodes in organismal lineages is accomplished through fossil reconstruction
of the past as well as by comparing extant organisms, looking for similarities
and differences in anatomies, physiologies, genes, behaviors, etc. From
this information classification and phylogenetic reconstruction is accomplished.
In this lecture
we will review the general way on how organisms are systematically classified,
in addition we will attempt to compare how the classification of living
organisms compares with that of fossils forms.
Some basic
rules for the classification of organisms:
In order to
make sense of the diversity of organisms, it is necessary to group similar
organisms together and organize these groups in a non-overlapping hierarchical
arrangement.
Taxonomy
is the science of biological classification.
The basic
taxonomic group is the species, which is defined in terms of either sexual
reproduction or general similarity.
Morphological,
physiological, metabolic, ecological, genetic, and molecular characteristics
are all useful in taxonomy because they reflect the organization and activity
of the genome. Nucleic acid structure is probably the best indicator of
relatedness because nucleic acids are either the genetic material itself
or the products of gene transcription.
Classifications are based on any analysis of possible evolutionary relationships (phylogenetic or phyletic classification) or on overall similarity (phenetic classification).
Linnaeus, Carolus (late 1700s) system of classification according to similarity: Carolus Linnaeus developed a system of classification of every known organism up to that time. This system is based on creating and differentiating groups in terms of structural (and other) similarities and differences. Linnaeus also invented binomial nomenclature to keep track of group members. That is the use of Genus and species names for all the organisms, e.g. Home sapiens for humans.
Systematics
Systematics
is the study of the diversity of organisms and their evolutionary relationships.
Science of
classification: Systematics is the science of the classification of organisms.
The main goal of systematics is the discovery and codification of phylogenetic
relationships between organisms.
The term systematics often is used for taxonomy. However, many taxonomists define it in more general terms as 'the scientific study of organisms with the ultimate object of characterizing and arranging them in an orderly manner.' Any study of the nature of organisms, when the knowledge gained is used in taxonomy, is a part of systematics. Thus systematics encompasses disciplines such as morphology, ecology, epidemiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, and physiology.
Taxon (pl. taxa), A taxon is a phylogenetic grouping of organisms. There are two related processes in taxonomy. Taxonomy is the science concerned with the identification, classification, nomenclature of organisms.
Taxonomy
[Greek taxis, arrangement or order, and nomos, law, or nemein, to distribute
or govern] is defined as the science of biological classification. In a
broader sense it consists of three separate but interrelated parts: classification,
nomenclature, and identification.
Note that
the terms systematics and taxonomy can often be used semantically in a
nearly indistinguishable manner.
Identification is the practical side of taxonomy, the process of determining that a particular (organism) belongs to a recognized taxon.
Classification is the arrangement of organisms into groups or taxa.
Nomenclature
is the branch of taxonomy concerned with the assignment of names to taxonomic
groups in agreement with published rules.
Note that
ideally names have taxonimic meaning, i.e., they give clues to phylogenetic
relationships.
Hierarchical classification The full description of a given organism's place among all the world's organisms does not end with its binomial designation. There exists a hierarchy of designations only the last of which describe genera and species denomination. A category in any rank unites groups in the level below it based on shared properties. The major designations, listed in terms of increasing specificity, include:
domain (empire/super-kingdom)
kingdom
phylum
class
order
family
genus
species
Phylogeny
[phylogenetic group]
A phylogeny
is a representation of organisms based on and describing evolutionary relationships.
Monophyletic
A phylogenitic
group (i.e., taxon) all of whose members are descended from a common ancestor
which is a member of the same phylogenitic group, and which consists of
all of the (known or considered) descendants of that common ancestor.
A monophyletic
taxon is a good taxon in an evolutionary sense, meaning that no members
which ought to be a part of the taxon, in terms of ancestor-descendant
relationships, are excluded.
Symbolic
examples:
For example,
if both B and C are descendants of A, then a monophyletic taxon would consist
of all three species.
For example,
if both C and D are descendants of B, and B is a direct descendant of A,
then a monophyletic taxon of these species could consist either of all
four species, or of just species B, C, and D.
Polyphyletic
A phylogenitic
group (i.e., taxon) all of whose members are descended from a common ancestor,
but in which one or more common ancestor is not a member of the same phylogenitic
group, and that missing common ancestor is the most recent common ancestor.
Paraphyletic
(Missing member)
A phylogenitic
group (i.e., taxon) all of whose members are descended from a common ancestor,
but which does not include all of the known or considered descendants of
that common ancestor. In the usage of cladists, a paraphyletic taxon is
a monophyletic taxon in which a member, other than the most recent common
ancestor, is excluded. Typically paraphyletic taxa represent the improper
exclusion of members on the basis of phenotypic differences rather than
on the basis of ancestor-descendant relationships.
Clades
The purpose
of phylogenetic studies is to establish the evolutionary relationships
among different species. In particular, we are interested in the identification
of natural clades. A clade is defined as a group of species that share
a common ancestor, which is not shared by another species outside of the
clade.
Monophylectic
taxon:
In other words,
a clade is a monophyletic taxon.
Clades are
the only phylogenetically/evolutionarily real taxons.
Other, non-monophyletic
(e.g., paraphyletic) taxons are based on, for example, just morphological
similarities rather than evolutionary relationships.
Example:
reptiles do not form a natural clade:
The reptiles
do not represent a true clade because, while there may be strong evolutionary
relationships within this group, there are also a number of taxa which
evolved from within this taxa but which are not included in the taxa reptiles
Examples of
these latter taxa include the birds, the mammals, and the dinosaurs as
well as a number of extinct lineages.
Example:
apes + humans form a clade:
The designation
apes, like reptiles, does not form a true clade, though here this problem
is easily corrected simply by accepting that humans are modified apes (just
as apes are modified mammals and mammals are modified reptiles and reptiles
are modified amphibians and amphibians are modified fish, etc.). That is,
humans plus those animals typically classified as apes together form a
monophyletic taxon, i.e., a clade.