Hyman Gregory, A., Schreiber Compo, N., Vertefeuille, L., & Zambruski, G. (2011) A comparison of U.S. police interviewers' notes with their subsequent reports.Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 203 -215.

Schreiber Compo, N., Evans, J.R., Carol, R., Villalba, D., Ham, L., Garcia, T. & Rose, S. (2012). Intoxicated witnesses: Better than their reputation? Law and Human Behavior, 36 (2), 77-86.

Vallano, J.P. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in a simulated mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25 (6), 960 - 970. 

Schreiber Compo, N., Hyman Gregory, A. R. & Fisher, R.P. (2012). Interviewing Behaviors in Police Investigators: A field study of a current U.S. sample. Psychology, Crime and Law, 18 (3-4), 359-375.

Schreiber Compo, N., Evans, J.R., Carol, R., Kemp, D.C., Villalba, D., Ham, L. & Rose, S. (2011). Alcohol intoxication and memory for events: A snapshot of alcohol myopia in a real-world drinking scenario. Memory, 19 (2), 202-210.

Schreiber Compo, N. & Parker, J.F. (2010). Gaining insight into long-term effects of inviting speculation: Does recantation help? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 969-990.

Wright, D.B., Carlucci, M., Evans, J.R. & Schreiber Compo, N.S. (2010). Turning a blind eye to non-blind line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 849-867.

Evans, J.R. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2010). Mock jurors’ perceptions of identifications made by intoxicated witnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law, 16(3),191-210.

Hyman Gregory, A., Carol, R. N., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2009). Talking with Children about Past Events: Children’s Memory and Suggestibility. In E. H. Sandberg & B. L.  Spritz (Eds.), A clinician's guide to normal cognitive development in childhood    (pp.155-171). New York, NY: Routledge.

Evans, J.R., Schreiber Compo, N. & Russano, M. (2009). Intoxicated Witnesses and Suspects: Procedures and Prevalence according to Law Enforcement. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 15(3), 194-221.

Malpass, R.S., Tredoux, C.G. , Schreiber Compo, N., McQuiston-Surrett, D., MacLin, O.H.,Zimmermann, L.A., & Topp. L.D. (2008). Study space analysis for policy development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(6), 789-801.

Norberg, S.F. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2007). Report on an empirical study of district variations, and the roles of judges, trustees and debtors’ attorneys in Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases, 81, The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 431.

Fisher, R.P. & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness memory. In Toglia, M., Lindsay, R., Ross, D. & Reed, J. (Eds.) The handbook of eyewitness psychology:  Volume One. Memory for events (pp.53-80). Mahwah, NJ:     Erlbaum Associates.

Schreiber, N., Bellah, L.D., Martinez, Y., McLaurin, K., Strok, R., Garven, S.,  & Wood,  J.M. (2006). Suggestive interviewing  in the McMartin preschool and Kelly Michaels day care abuse cases: A quantitative analysis. Social Influence, 1 (1), 16-47.

Fisher, R. P. & Schreiber, N. (2005). Forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology: Forensic interviewing. In J. Payne-James, R. Byard, T. Corey, & C. Henderson (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine (pp.371-378). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

Schreiber, N. & Parker, J.F. (2004). Inviting child witnesses to speculate: Effects of age and interaction on children’s recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89 (1), 31-52.

Schreiber, N., Wentura, D. & Bilsky, W. (2001). What else could he have done? – Creating false answers in child witnesses by ‚inviting speculation‘. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 525-532.

Schreiber, N. (2000). „Interviewing techniques in sexual abuse cases – a comparison of a day-care abuse case with normal abuse cases“. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59 (3),196- 206.

Schreiber, N. (2000). Zeugenbefragung von Kindern – Wie wirkt die Technik „Einladen  zur Spekulation?“. Grevenbroich: Linos-Verlag. (book)

Sporer, S.L., Bursch, S.E., Schreiber, N., Weiss, P.E., Höfer, E., Sievers, K. & Köhnken, G.(2000). Detecting deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgement Scales (ARJS): Inter- rater reliability. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law. Traditional questions and new ideas (pp.197-204). Krakow: Institute of Forensic Research Publishers.